Environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system: A scaled discourse-analytical perspective

Jiang Xu

Urban Studies, 2016, vol. 53, issue 5, 978-999

Abstract: The past two decades have witnessed a growing body of research that draws on post-structuralist theory to interrogate environmental discourses in planning. Grounded in the interpretative tradition, this approach rejects essentialist ontology to assume environmental discourses being socially constructed and linked to different policy arenas at multiple geographical scales. Widely applied in the environmental politics and planning studies in advanced capitalism, the scaled discourse analysis has not yet been deployed in China’s context. This paper will use this approach to interpret the political and scalar construction of the environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system. It has developed two primary arguments. First, there exist multiple narratives of ‘environment’ instead of a single narrative. The environmental discourses in planning depend on how the political regime makes sense of environmental phenomenon rather than simply the urgency of that phenomenon. The second argument builds upon the first one to contend that the formation and legitimisation of environmental discourses in planning is a power-laden process through which multiple narratives are contested at interlocking scales. These arguments are elaborated upon through a discussion of the changing environmental discourses in four post-1978 master plans of Guangzhou, the capital city of Guangdong Province in South China.

Keywords: China; environmental discourse analysis; Guangzhou; scale; urban planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015571054 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:5:p:978-999

DOI: 10.1177/0042098015571054

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().