Why bright city lights dazzle and illuminate: A cognitive science approach to urban promises

Rodrigo Cardoso, Evert Meijers, Maarten van Ham, Martijn Burger and Duco de Vos
Additional contact information
Rodrigo Cardoso: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, The Netherlands
Evert Meijers: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, The Netherlands

Urban Studies, 2019, vol. 56, issue 2, 452-470

Abstract: Despite the many uncertainties of life in cities, promises of economic prosperity, social mobility and happiness have fuelled the imagination of generations of urban migrants in search of a better life. Access to jobs, housing and amenities, and fewer restrictions of personal choices are some of the perceived advantages of cities, characterised here as ‘urban promises’. But while discourses celebrating the triumph of cities became increasingly common, urban rewards are not available everywhere and for everyone. Alongside opportunity, cities offer inequality, conflict and poor living conditions. Their narrative of promise has been persistent across different times and places, but the outcomes and experiences of urban life compare poorly with the overoptimistic expectations of many newcomers. And yet, millions still come and stay regardless of odds, raising the question why we have such positive and persistent expectations about cities. To examine this question, this paper considers the process of urban migration from the perspective of decision-making under uncertainty. It discusses how decisions and evaluations are based on imperfect information and offers a novel contribution by examining how the cognitive biases and heuristics which restrict human rationality shape our responses to urban promises. This approach may allow a better understanding of how people make decisions regarding urban migration, how they perceive their urban experiences and evaluate their life stories. We consider the prospects and limitations of the behavioural approach and discuss how biases favouring narratives of bright urban futures can be exploited by ‘triumphalist’ accounts of cities which neglect their embedded injustices.

Keywords: cognitive biases and heuristics; decision-making; social mobility; subjective wellbeing; urban migration; urban triumphalism; 关键è¯; 认知å è§ å’Œå ¯å ‘å¼ æ€ ç»´; 决策; ç¤¾ä¼šæµ åŠ¨æ€§; ä¸»è§‚å¹¸ç¦ æ„Ÿ; åŸŽå¸‚è¿ ç§»; 城市胜利主义 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098018804762 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:2:p:452-470

DOI: 10.1177/0042098018804762

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().