EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Economic impacts of alternative greenspace configurations in fast growing cities: The case of Greater Beijing

Mingfei Ma and Ying Jin
Additional contact information
Mingfei Ma: Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, UK
Ying Jin: Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, UK

Urban Studies, 2019, vol. 56, issue 8, 1498-1515

Abstract: Greenspaces at the city scale, like greenbelts, green-wedges or green-grids, have become well-known instruments for shaping urban economic activity and land use. The economic impacts of such instruments are complex and hard to measure. This article addresses one of the rarely studied problems of measuring the economic impacts of alternative greenspace configurations in fast growing cities. In such cities, there is an uncertain basis for making such greenspace related decisions, for example the assumptions about the cities’ total population and economic activity. Decision makers have few tools to measure and predict the potential economic costs and benefits of alternative greenspace configurations. We present a new model that allows tracking over time of both non-divisible land use decisions and a multitude of gradual adaptations made by businesses and consumers. The model is applied to Greater Beijing, one of the fast growing cities that is actively exploring alternative greenspace configurations to control urban expansion. The modelling results suggest that compared with the trend-development scenario of no greenspace intervention, a strict greenbelt would decrease the overall consumer surplus in Beijing by US$3.3 billion, while an adaptive mix of green-wedges and green-grid would increase consumer surplus by US$3.6 billion per year in 2030. The adaptive configuration also reduces car journeys by 11% in Beijing. More generally, modelling results show that a flexible design of strategic greenspaces and careful siting of new development around metro stations within the designated greenspaces could benefit consumers and promote sustainable travel.

Keywords: Greater Beijing; greenspace; Land Use Transport Interaction (LUTI); recursive spatial equilibrium; urban modelling; 大北京; 绿地; 土地使用交通互动(LUTI); é€’å½’ç©ºé—´å ‡è¡¡; 城市建模 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098018770115 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:8:p:1498-1515

DOI: 10.1177/0042098018770115

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:56:y:2019:i:8:p:1498-1515