Park futures: Excavating images of tomorrow’s urban green spaces

Anna Barker, Adam Crawford, Nathan Booth and David Churchill
Additional contact information
Anna Barker: University of Leeds, UK
Adam Crawford: University of Leeds, UK
Nathan Booth: Independent researcher, UK
David Churchill: University of Leeds, UK

Urban Studies, 2020, vol. 57, issue 12, 2456-2472

Abstract: British urban parks are a creation of the 19th century and a central feature in the Victorian image of the city. In the UK, parks are at a critical juncture as to their future role, prospects and sustainability. This article contributes to renewed interest in ‘social futures’ by thinking forward through the past about the trajectory of Victorian public parks. We outline six images of what parks might become, derived from traces in history and extrapolations from current trends. These projections diverge in terms of adaptations to funding and governance, management of competing demands and organisation of use. In contrast to a dominant Victorian park ideal and its relative continuity over time, we are likely to see the intensification of increasingly varied park futures. We draw attention to interaction effects between these differing images of the future. Excavated from the Victorian legacy, the park futures presented have wider potential inferences and resonance, including beyond the UK. By mapping divergent visions for parks, we call for a public debate about how parks might be re-imagined in ways that draw upon their rich heritage and highlight the pivotal role of civil society actors in shaping future pathways between possible, probable and preferable futures.

Keywords: austerity; social diversity; social futures; urban parks; Victorian heritage; 紧缩; ç¤¾ä¼šå¤šæ ·æ€§; ç¤¾ä¼šæœªæ ¥; 城市公园; ç»´å¤šåˆ©äºšé —äº§ (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019875405 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:12:p:2456-2472

DOI: 10.1177/0042098019875405

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().