Heterogeneity of public participation in urban redevelopment in Chinese cities: Beijing versus Guangzhou

Lin Zhang, Yanliu Lin, Pieter Hooimeijer and Stan Geertman
Additional contact information
Lin Zhang: Utrecht University, the Netherlands
Yanliu Lin: Utrecht University, the Netherlands
Pieter Hooimeijer: Utrecht University, the Netherlands
Stan Geertman: Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Urban Studies, 2020, vol. 57, issue 9, 1903-1919

Abstract: Chinese cities, especially large cities, are in urgent need of urban redevelopment but social conflicts in redevelopment processes have threatened social stability. Public participation has been stipulated in national policies to alleviate these conflicts and the responsibility to implement these policies has been delegated to local governments. Therefore, the features of public participation may differ between Chinese cities. Yet, a systematic investigation of this possible heterogeneity is lacking. This article adapts 11 features of governance to build a framework to compare public participation in urban redevelopment in Beijing and Guangzhou. Findings show that the two cities are similar in five features (policy instruments, policy integration, initiators, position of stakeholders, policy level at which citizens operate) but differ in six (policy goals, policy–science interface, power base of citizens, model of representation, rules of interaction and mechanisms of social interaction), making citizens in urban redevelopment in Guangzhou more powerful than their counterparts in Beijing. The observed shift towards urban micro-redevelopment might further strengthen the power of citizens in urban redevelopment in Beijing, but might weaken their power base in Guangzhou. The findings highlight the importance of local context and policy dynamics in the study of public participation in urban redevelopment in China.

Keywords: China; heterogeneity; public participation; urban governance; urban redevelopment; 中国; 异质性; å…¬ä¼—å ‚ä¸Ž; åŸŽå¸‚æ²»ç †; åŸŽå¸‚å† å¼€å ‘ (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019862192 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:9:p:1903-1919

DOI: 10.1177/0042098019862192

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().