 Public realm ethnography: (Non-)Participation, co-presence and the challenge of situated multiplicityAlasdair Jones Urban Studies, 2021, vol. 58, issue 2, 425-440 Abstract: Against the backdrop of abstract accounts of a variety of processes associated with the ‘end of public space’ (disneyfication, commodification, privatisation, gentrification, securitisation and so on), the last few decades have witnessed a marked growth in ethnographic accounts of the production, meaning and experience of urban public spaces. Methodologically, studying these dimensions of public space ethnographically poses clear challenges for how researchers design and conduct their fieldwork: practically, how can fieldworkers participate in a socio-spatial context typically characterised by ‘situated multiplicity’ (Amin A (2008) Collective culture and urban public space. City 12(1): 5–24) and co-presence with strangers? Moreover, what do researchers do when there are no core group activities, institutional roles or (sub-)cultural practices to participate in? With these questions in mind, I first seek to review the practical fieldwork techniques used by ethnographers interested in studying the urban public realm. I then use this review to synthesise and distil a set of four interlinked fieldwork heuristics for public realm ethnography. Keywords: co-presence; ethnography; fieldwork; participant observation; public realm; situated multiplicity; å…±å˜; 人类å¦; 实地调查; å ‚ä¸Žæ€§è§‚å¯Ÿ; 公共领域; æƒ…å¢ƒå¤šæ ·æ€§ (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:2:p:425-440 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.