 The changing social structure of global cities: Professionalisation, proletarianisation or polarisationUrban Studies, 2021, vol. 58, issue 5, 1050-1066 Abstract: This paper addresses a simple, but very important, question. How has the occupational class structure of major world or global cities changed in recent decades? This has major social and theoretical implications given the claims made by Friedmann (1986) and Sassen (1991) regarding social polarisation in world or global cities. The paper outlines and compares three positions regarding the changing occupational class structure of world cities and of Western societies in general: professionalisation, proletarianisation and social polarisation. The paper does not provide original empirical evidence. Instead, it provides a wide-ranging overview of evidence from existing studies in a range of cities in both Global North and South over the last 50 years. It concludes that whereas professionalisation is common to most global cities, there is little evidence for proletarianisation, and that polarisation is a contingent outcome in certain cities at certain times. The claims for a common universal pattern are rejected and variations in national economic, political and social structure and policy are argued to be more important. Keywords: class; diversity/cohesion/segregation; inequality; polarisation; professionalisation; 阶级; å¤šæ ·æ€§/å‡ è šåŠ›/隔离; ä¸ å¹³ç‰; ä¸¤æž åˆ†åŒ–; 专业化 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:5:p:1050-1066 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.