 Mind the rent gap: Blackstone, housing investment and the reordering of urban rent surfacesBrett Christophers Urban Studies, 2022, vol. 59, issue 4, 698-716 Abstract: Recent years have seen a burst of new writing on the opening and closing of urban rent gaps. Such studies generally consider individual cases. Rarely does the opportunity arise to readily compare and contrast rent gaps across multiple cities and territories, least of all within the context of a single developer or investor portfolio. Such an opportunity has arisen in the past decade, however, as the US investment firm Blackstone has pursued a multi-territory housing-investment strategy specifically of identifying and closing rent gaps, which it styles ‘buy it, fix it, sell it’. This article examines that strategy and the varying nature of its implementation in Danish, German, Swedish and US cities. It argues that the rent gap is a paradoxical phenomenon: vast gaps, promising vast profits, frequently open up and frequently remain open for long periods before being closed – if they are closed at all. A primary reason is that successful and profitable closure requires not just favourable local political-economic conditions but a singularly well-funded, determined and aggressive investor – an investor, that is, such as Blackstone. Keywords: built environment; development; economic processes; finance; financialisation; housing; 建ç‘环境; å ‘å±•; ç» æµŽè¿›ç¨‹; 金èž; é‡‘èž åŒ–; ä½ æˆ¿ (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:4:p:698-716 DOI: 10.1177/00420980211026466 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.