Good And Bad News For The Implementation Of Shareholder-Value Concepts In Decentralized Organizations - A Critical Study Comparing the DCF Method and the EVA Method

Thomas Pfeiffer

Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), 2000, vol. 52, issue 1, 68 – 91

Abstract: This paper investigates the suitability of different performance measures to evaluate the performance of investment center managers, when intrafirm coordination problems arise between headquarters and divisional management. The performance measures analyzed are based on available accounting information: cash in- and outflows, depreciation and book value. We characterize the entire class of time-variant performance measures that (i) enable the implementation of a given investment level non-trivially and/or (ii) induce goal congruence between both parties for inelastic and elastic investments. The findings show the possibilities and limitations of different performance measures as adequate control instruments. In particular, the findings for two methods often used in everyday business operations – Economic Value Added (EVA) method and Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method – are discussed in detail.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:52:y:2000:i:1:p:68-91

Access Statistics for this article

Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) is currently edited by Wolfgang Ballwieser

More articles in Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) from LMU Munich School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by sbr ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).