Strategic Transfer Pricing With Risk-Averse Agents
Robert Göx and
Jens Robert Schöndube
Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), 2004, vol. 56, issue 2, 98-118
Abstract:
In this paper we analyze strategic transfer pricing with risk- and effort-averse divisional managers. In contrast to earlier literature, we find that the existence of a standard agency problem allows transfer pricing to serve as a commitment device even if the transfer prices are not mutually observable. The reason is that transfer prices are set above marginal cost to solve the agency problem and not for strategic purposes. Therefore, delegating the pricing authority to a risk-averse manager implies that he sets a higher product price than does the risk-neutral owner, because at the divisional level the transfer price represents the relevant unit cost for pricing. We show that the optimal scope of managerial authority generally depends on both the risk premium and the intensity of competition in the product market. We also identify conditions under which the delegation of pricing responsibilities to risk-averse managers constitutes a dominant strategy equilibrium.
Keywords: Agency Theory; Duopoly Theory; Strategic Transfer Pricing. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D49 D82 L13 M40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:56:y:2004:i:2:p:98-118
Access Statistics for this article
Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) is currently edited by Wolfgang Ballwieser
More articles in Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) from LMU Munich School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by sbr ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).