Promotors or Champions? Pros and Cons of role Specialisation for Economic Process

Katja Rost, Katharina Hölzle and Hans-Georg Gemünden

Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), 2007, vol. 59, issue 4, 340-363

Abstract: According to the Great-Man Theory, the creation of something new used to be accredited solely to one outstanding individual: the champion. This prevailing notion in Angloamerican research was first challenged by Witte (1973), who concluded that an innovation cannot be a one-man decision, since the creation of something new usually involves highly complex and multi-person decision processes. Witte’s model credits the success not to one all-around individual, but to the cooperation of several different specialized persons (so called promotors). Even though the Great-Man Theory is still leading the discussion, the idea of specialized promotors should not be underestimated. In this article we discuss the circumstances under which specialized promotors or generalized champions are better suited for economic progress. We find extensive empirical proof for both roles.

Keywords: Champions; Promotors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M12 O32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:59:y:2007:i:4:p:340-363

Access Statistics for this article

Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) is currently edited by Wolfgang Ballwieser

More articles in Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) from LMU Munich School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by sbr ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).