Evaluating the New: The Contingent Value of a Pro-Innovation Bias

Oliver Baumann and Dirk Martignoni

Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), 2011, vol. 63, issue 4, 393-415

Abstract: It is a central tenet in the literature on organizational change that firms need to explore novel courses of action in order to adapt and survive. Should firms thus exhibit a “pro-innovation bias” when evaluating novel decision alternatives? Or should firms rather assess new opportunities as objectively as possible? Our analysis of a simulation model suggests that a pro-innovation bias can have exploration-enhancing effects that increase long-run performance in complex and stable environments, but can also decrease performance substantially if the bias becomes too pronounced. However, under most other conditions, an unbiased, objective evaluation of novel opportunities is most effective. We also identify a set of contingency factors that strongly affect the value of a pro-innovation bias, which may explain why it is that we see so few firms with such a bias.

Keywords: Innovation; Organizational Decision Making; Organizational Exploration and Adaptation; Organizational Search (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C63 D21 D83 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:63:y:2011:i:4:p:393-415

Access Statistics for this article

Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) is currently edited by Wolfgang Ballwieser

More articles in Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr) from LMU Munich School of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by sbr ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).