The Concept of Prudence in Theory and Practice

Tanja ?estanj-Peri? () and Suzana Keglevi? Kozjak ()
Additional contact information
Tanja ?estanj-Peri?: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics
Suzana Keglevi? Kozjak: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Tanja Sestanj-Peric

International Journal of Economic Sciences, 2020, vol. 9, issue 1, 156-178

Abstract: This paper studies the concept of prudence in view of the recent changes related to this accounting concept in The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (CF) prepared by International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Accounting standards should be based on clear concepts that enable the understanding why individual standards are stipulated the way they are and allow establishment of new recognition and measurement practices not yet covered by standards. This paper contributes to the cognition of how important it is to clarify the concepts underlying the preparation of mandatory financial statements. The conclusions of the paper could be useful for regulators.The revised CF emphasizes ?cautious prudence? supposedly supporting neutrality and neglects conservatism or ?asymmetric prudence?. Firstly, this paper examines the stance of researchers towards the concept of prudence and reviews the results of some influential theoretical and empirical papers related to accounting conservatism, which is a term used in academic literature instead of the term prudence. Secondly, the effects of more or less conservative treatment on financial reports and usefulness of such information are analyzed based on hypothetical examples. Finally, the examples of how real companies treat development costs are used for the conclusions. The results of analyzed papers show that the most useful information is often information produced by conservative accounting system. Hypothetical examples illustrate how conservatism influences financial reports and real examples confirm the use of conservatism in practice. Therefore, CF as a foundation for development of individual standards should accept conservatism or ?asymmetric prudence? as important as neutrality.

Keywords: Accounting standards; Conservatism; Financial reporting; IFRS Conceptual Framework; Prudence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 M48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://iises.net/international-journal-of-economi ... lication-detail-7094
https://iises.net/international-journal-of-economi ... tail-7094?download=9

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sek:jijoes:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:156-178

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Economic Sciences is currently edited by Robert Holman

More articles in International Journal of Economic Sciences from International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klara Cermakova ().