EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Exploring Trends and Variations in Agency Scope

Jacint Jordana and D. Levi-faur

Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 2010, vol. 11, issue 4, 342-361

Abstract: What are the trends in the design of regulatory agencies’ scope of responsibilities? To shed some light on this issue, we explore temporal, sectoral, national and regional variations in the scope of agencies across 16 different policy domains and 48 countries. This exercise represents a first step towards a theoretically driven empirical explanation of the determinants of agency scope. Focusing on the distinction between single- and multi-sector agencies, we demonstrate how agency scope is contingent on national, sectoral and regional characteristics, and provide a preliminary analysis of the characteristics of these variations. Our analysis of the data demonstrates, first, that the scope of agencies has been expanding fast since the late 1990s, often as a result of the extension of regulatory agencification to new sectors, and second, that multi-sectoral agencies are more common in Europe than in Latin America, in economic regulation than in social regulation, and in smaller countries than in bigger ones.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sen:journl:v:11:i:4:y:2010:p:342-361

Access Statistics for this article

Competition and Regulation in Network Industries is currently edited by Hans Kluwer

More articles in Competition and Regulation in Network Industries from Intersentia
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Petra Van den Bempt ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:11:i:4:y:2010:p:342-361