Revisiting the Global Food Architecture. Lessons from the 2008 Food Crisis
Luc Christiaensen
Review of Business and Economic Literature, 2009, vol. 54, issue 3, 345-362
Abstract:
The 2008 episode of food price explosion, political turmoil and human suffering revealed important flaws in the current global food architecture. This paper argues that to safeguard the strengths of the current system, four failures in market functioning and policymaking need to be addressed. First, governments should reinvest in agriculture with a focus on public goods and subject to increased public accountability to re-ensure the global food supply. Second, the policy-induced link between food and fuel prices must be broken through a revision of EU and US agro-fuel policies. Third, better sharing of information on food stocks, stricter WTO regulation of export restrictions, and some form of globally managed buffer stock will be minimum requirements to prevent the resurgence of more inefficient national food self-sufficiency policies. Fourth, a market based food security system is only sustainable given well functioning national social safety nets.
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Working Paper: Revisiting the Global Food Architecture: Lessons from the 2008 Food Crisis (2010) 
Journal Article: Revisiting the Global Food Architecture. Lessons from the 2008 Food Crisis (2009) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:54:i:3:y:2009:p:345-362
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Business and Economic Literature is currently edited by Hans Kluwer
More articles in Review of Business and Economic Literature from Intersentia
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Petra Van den Bempt ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).