EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

EU Energy Sector Perspectives for 2030 Beyond the 20–20–20 Objective

Pantelis Capros, N. Tasios, A. De Vita, Leonidas Mantzos and L. Parousos
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Leonidas Paroussos ()

Review of Business and Economic Literature, 2012, vol. 57, issue 2, 179-212

Abstract: This paper analyses the energy system and cost implications of moving beyond the 20% greenhouse gas emission target agreed in the EU’s Climate and Energy package of 2008. The paper states that due to the economic crisis the cost of going beyond the 20% target to a 25% or 30% domestic target has decreased significantly. This could be an opportunity to increase the 20% target for 2020 and adopt a 40% emission reduction target for 2030 which will have a beneficial effect: a strong reduction in the prices of ETS (Emission Trading System) allowances in the short-term (2020) can be avoided and it could set the EU on a path to achieve the 2050 climate objectives in the long-term. From a macro-economic perspective, and thus excluding auction payments, the energy system costs on top of the costs for implementing the Climate and Energy package are found to be below 0.1% for both scenarios in the cumulative time period 2010–2030.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:57:i:2:y:2012:p:179-212

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Business and Economic Literature is currently edited by Hans Kluwer

More articles in Review of Business and Economic Literature from Intersentia
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Petra Van den Bempt ().

 
Page updated 2020-07-29
Handle: RePEc:sen:rebelj:v:57:i:2:y:2012:p:179-212