 Heurystyki i bledy poznawcze jako zrodlo niepowodzen audytu zewnetrznego (Heuristics and cognitive biases as a reason of external audit failures)Aleksandra Wasowska ()
Problemy Zarzadzania, 2013, vol. 11, issue 43, 189-202 Abstract: Spectacular financial reporting scandals of last years (cases of Enron, WorldCom, Parmalat and others) are usually attributed to conscious actions of auditors. When analyzing the reasons of audit failures scholars point at the lack of independence of auditors, who act against professional ethics and issue opinions which are in line with the expectations of the clients. Psychological studies suggest however, that the main reasons of audit failures are not negligence or conscious corruption, but cognitive biases. The article presents the main cognitive limitations which affect judgment and decision-making process of auditors: heuristics (availability, representativeness and anchoring), overconfidence, escalation of commitment and motivated reasoning. We present structural characteristics which make the auditing industry prone to cognitive biases. We also discuss possible measures aimed at reducing the number of audit failures. Keywords: audit; judgments; decision-making; heuristics; cognitive biases (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:11:i:43:y:2013:p:189-202 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Problemy Zarzadzania from University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.