Ewaluacja projektow i abstraktow – wplyw indywidualnego stylu ewaluacji na oceny (Evaluation of grant proposals and abstracts – the influence of individual evaluation style on ratings)

Grzegorz Krol () and Katarzyna Kinga Kowalczyk
Additional contact information
Grzegorz Krol: Wydzial Zarzadzania, Uniwersytet Warszawskii
Katarzyna Kinga Kowalczyk: Wydzial Zarzadzania, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Problemy Zarzadzania, 2014, vol. 12, issue 45, 137-155

Abstract: In this article we present an outline of psychological model of evaluation and results of ratings analysis for 673 abstracts submitted to international conference and 323 grant proposals. In both cases one evaluator (reviewer) evaluated many proposals or abstracts, which allowed us to demonstrate individual evaluation style (for 18 grant proposals evaluators and 33 abstract reviewers), operationalized by leniency/severity level and degree of ratings differentiation. We showed as well relation between rank order and severity rating (first 15 abstracts were rated more severely than others). It is suggested that this relation can be explained by two alternative explanations: stabilization of implicit comparative standard and fatigue.

Keywords: evaluation; implicit standards; reviews; leniency terror; ratings differentiation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/pz_1_2014_krol_kowalczyk.pdf (application/pdf)
http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:12:i:45:y:2014:p:137-155

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Problemy Zarzadzania from University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().