PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN A EUROPEAN CONTEXT. CASE STUDY: POSSIBILITIES TO COMPLETE THE TRIAL PERIOD – PRACTICE AT NATIONAL LEVEL VERSUS PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

Camelia Daciana Stoian () and Eugenia Iovanas ()
Additional contact information
Camelia Daciana Stoian: ãAurel VlaicuÓ University of Arad, Romania
Eugenia Iovanas: ãAurel VlaicuÓ University of Arad, Romania

Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 2022, vol. 11, issue 3, 427-431

Abstract: As social policy is outlined and its objectives stated in the provisions of Article 151 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, both the Union and the member states must be responsible for respecting "fundamental social rights such as those stated in the European Social Charter signed in Turin on 18 October 1961 and in the Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers adopted in 1989". In the light of these goals, we are concerned with an analysis aimed at a legal and fair promotion and harmonization of the procedure for filling positions at the public administration level, with an emphasis on the protection of social rights and the harmonization of good practices developed, in conditions of honest social protection and combating exclusion and discrimination of any kind. It is therefore necessary, at a theoretical level, to take it for granted that the Union and all its member states implement practices aimed at favoring the harmonization of social systems. Concretely, however, we find that the applied procedures neglect the approximation of the issued administrative documents and any kind of common methodology, as long as a report is not regulated or applied at the national level that reproduces the conclusions of the verification of the professional skills of the employee at the end of the trial period. We propose in this article a substantiated analysis of the methods of termination of trial periods, so that the termination of employment contracts concluded during the trial period exclusively through a written notification, without notice and without any motivation, is no longer the concern of the courts, because the court cannot verify the existence or not of the professional aptitude in the absence of the presentation of some arguments by the employer that aim to fulfill or not within reasonable terms the assigned duties, certain difficulties in the service relationship or the degree of accommodation with the administrative and hierarchical system.

Keywords: professional skills; trial period; report at the end of the trial period. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K23 K33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://adjuris.ro/revista/articole/An11nr3/9.%20Iovanas,%20Stoian%20EN.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sja:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:427-431

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Perspectives of Law and Public Administration from Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catalin-Silviu Sararu ().