 Comments on Daniel Sichel's Review Article on The Rise and Fall of American GrowthRobert J. Gordon () International Productivity Monitor, 2016, vol. 31, 63-67 Abstract: Daniel Sichel's review focusses mainly on the future of innovation and technology. In contrast, my book is mainly about the past, and the reasons why the growth rate of total factor productivity in the years since 1970 has averaged only about one-third the rate registered between 1920 and 1970. My explanation is that a series of "Great Inventions" in the late 19th century, led by electricity and the internal combustion engine, utterly changed methods of production in the business economy and conditions of work on the job and at home. The digital revolution since 1960 has transformed business methods further and led to a temporary recovery of productivity growth between 1995 and 2004, but slow growth since 2004 suggests that the major impacts of the digital revolution are largely over, while technological transformations in the future will be evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Keywords: Productivity; Productivity Growth; Economic Growth; Living Standards; Review (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:31:y:2016:5 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article International Productivity Monitor is currently edited by Andrew Sharpe, Executive Director More articles in International Productivity Monitor from Centre for the Study of Living Standards 170 Laurier Ave. W, Suite 604, Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.