Pro-Productivity Institutions: Learning from National Experience

Sean Dougherty and Andrea Renda

International Productivity Monitor, 2017, vol. 32, 196-217

Abstract: This article analyses and compares ten institutions that have a mandate to promote

Keywords: Productivity; OECD; Policies; Global Productivity; Total Factor Productivity; Wages; academics; institutions; pro-productivity; government policy; capital; knowledge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D24 D83 E02 G18 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-32/pro-produ ... national-experience/ Abstract page (English and French) (text/html)
https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-32-11-Dougherty-Renda.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Pro-Productivity Institutions: Learning from National Experience (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:32:y:2017:11

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.csls.ca

Access Statistics for this article

International Productivity Monitor is currently edited by Stephen Tapp

More articles in International Productivity Monitor from Centre for the Study of Living Standards 170 Laurier Ave. W, Suite 604, Ottawa, ON K1P 5V5. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CSLS ().