 When users of congested roads may view tolls as unjustAmihai Glazer and Esko Niskanen European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, 2005, issue 31, 6-14 Abstract: Though congestion tolls can increase social welfare, the public often opposes them. One explanation for the opposition is that a road user views a congestion toll as punishment for the damage he causes others. Since a user suffers from congestion, he believes that he has already suffered some punishment and therefore it is unfair or unjust to impose a toll in addition. We assume that a person views a congestion toll as unjust if the toll exceeds the difference between the congestion externality a road user generates on others and the uncompensated externality he suffers from others. We explore the implications of such a view. We illustrate how to determine the toll that satisfies this criterion of justice and how the socially optimal toll violates the criterion. We examine how the just toll varies with the parameters of the model. We discuss the implications of alternative definitions of justice and possible extensions of the basic model considered. Keywords: Congestion tolls; Unjust tolls; Social optimum (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sot:journl:y:2005:i:31:p:6-14 Access Statistics for this article European Transport \ Trasporti Europei is currently edited by Romeo Danielis More articles in European Transport \ Trasporti Europei from ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.