EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inferring consensus weights from pairwise comparison matrices without suitable properties

Jacinto González-Pachón () and Carlos Romero

Annals of Operations Research, 2007, vol. 154, issue 1, 123-132

Abstract: Pairwise comparison is a popular method for establishing the relative importance of n objects. Its main purpose is to get a set of weights (priority vector) associated with the objects. When the information gathered from the decision maker does not verify some rational properties, it is not easy to search the priority vector. Goal programming is a flexible tool for addressing this type of problem. In this paper, we focus on a group decision-making scenario. Thus, we analyze different methodologies for getting a collective priority vector. The first method is to aggregate general pairwise comparison matrices (i.e., matrices without suitable properties) and then get the priority vector from the consensus matrix. The second method proposes to get the collective priority vector by formulating an optimization problem without determining the consensus pairwise comparison matrix beforehand. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Keywords: Pairwise comparisons; Group decisions; Preference aggregation; Goal programming (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-007-0182-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:154:y:2007:i:1:p:123-132:10.1007/s10479-007-0182-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-007-0182-4

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:154:y:2007:i:1:p:123-132:10.1007/s10479-007-0182-4