Optimal design of container inspection strategies considering multiple objectives via an evolutionary approach

Ana Concho and José Ramirez-Marquez ()

Annals of Operations Research, 2012, vol. 196, issue 1, 167-187

Abstract: The size and complexity of containerized shipping across the globe has increased the vulnerability of seaports to the attack of terrorist networks and contraband smuggling. As a result, the creation of inspection strategies to check incoming containers at ports-of-entry has been necessary to enable the detection of containers carrying prohibited items. However, since costs and tardiness considerations related to the inspection process prevent all cargo to be manually checked, including different non-intrusive screening technologies as part of the inspection strategies is essential to optimize inspection needs. In this paper, inspection strategies are represented as decision-tree structures where each node illustrates a screening device, and links represent the two possible classifications a screened container can get (i.e. suspicious or unsuspicious). Based on such classification, one of three actions is taken: to continue screening, release or physically check the container. The contribution of this paper is a mathematical framework that provides an approximation to the Pareto optimal solutions (i.e. inspection strategies) that enable decision-makers to: (1) identify tradeoffs among vulnerability, inspection cost, and tardiness for different inspection strategies, and based on this (2) find the strategy that best suits current inspection needs. The mathematical framework includes: (1) a multi-objective optimization model that concurrently minimizes vulnerability, cost, and tardiness while determining screening device allocation and threshold settings, as well as, (2) an evolutionary approach used to solve the optimization model. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Keywords: Container inspection; Optimization; Multi-objective; Evolutionary approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:196:y:2012:i:1:p:167-187:10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1069-6

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().