Using Brouwer’s continuity principle to pick stocks
Jack Stecher () and
Mark Atten ()
Annals of Operations Research, 2015, vol. 225, issue 1, 171 pages
This article shows that an apparent puzzle in finance and accounting is resolved by changing from classical to constructive (more specifically, intuitionistic) mathematics. Our position is that it is unproblematic if real-world actors behave inconsistently with nonconstructive mathematical results. Thus the solution to our puzzle lies in a deeper challenge to the standard view of how rational agents reason. The alternative we propose gives refutable predictions that find support in the empirical capital markets literature. Our main tool, intuitionistic mathematics, plays a similar role in the mathematical philosophy literature to that of ambiguity in decision theoretic work. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Intuitionism; Rationality; Constructive mathematics; Equity valuation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:225:y:2015:i:1:p:161-171:10.1007/s10479-013-1404-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros
More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().