Calibration, sharpness and the weighting of experts in a linear opinion pool
Stephen Hora () and
Erim Kardeş ()
Annals of Operations Research, 2015, vol. 229, issue 1, 429-450
Abstract:
Linear opinion pools are the most common form of aggregating the probabilistic judgments of multiple experts. Here, the performance of such an aggregation is examined in terms of the calibration and sharpness of the component judgments. The performance is measured through the average quadratic score of the aggregate. Trade-offs between calibration and sharpness are examined and an expression for the optimal weighting of two dependent experts in a linear combination is given. Circumstances where one expert would be disqualified are investigated. Optimal weights for the multiple, dependent experts are found through a concave quadratic program. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Probabilistic expert judgment; Subjective probability; Scoring rules; Subject matter expert; Calibration; Quadratic score; Brier score (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-015-1846-0 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:229:y:2015:i:1:p:429-450:10.1007/s10479-015-1846-0
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-015-1846-0
Access Statistics for this article
Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros
More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().