Modeling uncertainty of expert elicitation for use in risk-based optimization
Michael D. Teter (),
Johannes O. Royset () and
Alexandra M. Newman ()
Additional contact information
Michael D. Teter: Colorado School of Mines
Johannes O. Royset: Naval Postgraduate School
Alexandra M. Newman: Colorado School of Mines
Annals of Operations Research, 2019, vol. 280, issue 1, No 9, 189-210
Abstract:
Abstract Capital budgeting optimization models, used in a broad number of fields, require certain and uncertain parameters. Often times, elicited subject matter expert (SME) opinion is used as a parameter estimate, which does not always yield perfect information or correspond to a single value. Because of the uncertainty of the elicitation, the unknown true value of a parameter can be modeled as a random variable from a to-be-determined distribution. We estimate a univariate distribution using four different approaches, the Beta and Gaussian distributions, a standard Gaussian Kernel estimate, and an exponential epi-spline. We also capture dependencies within the parameters through three multivariate approaches: the multivariate Gaussian distribution, the multivariate Kernel and the multivariate exponential epi-spline. This is the first three-dimensional application of the latter. Sampling from the densities, we generate scenarios and implement a superquantile risk-based, capital budgeting optimization model. Numerical experiments contrast the differences between estimators, as well as their effects on an optimal solution. Our findings demonstrate that naively averaging the SME observations for use in optimization, rather than incorporating uncertainty, results in an overly optimistic portfolio. The flexibility of the exponential epi-spline estimator to fuse soft information with observed data produces reasonable density functions for univariate and multivariate random variables. Including a decision-maker’s risk-averseness through risk-based optimization delivers conservative results while incorporating the uncertainty of unknown parameters. We demonstrate a 20% improvement for this specific case when using our approach as opposed to the naive method.
Keywords: Exponential epi-splines; Nonparametric density estimation; Optimization; Mathematical programming; Capital budgeting; Judgment elicitation; Subject matter expert; Superquantile (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-3011-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:280:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-3011-z
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-3011-z
Access Statistics for this article
Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros
More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().