Inventory sharing of professional optics product supply chain with equal power agents
Chun-Hung Chiu (),
Gang Hao,
Xin Dai and
Hang Xie
Additional contact information
Chun-Hung Chiu: Sun Yat-sen University
Gang Hao: City University of Hong Kong
Xin Dai: Xinhua College of Sun Yat-sen University
Hang Xie: Sun Yat-sen University
Annals of Operations Research, 2020, vol. 291, issue 1, No 7, 169-194
Abstract:
Abstract This study investigates the inventory sharing policy of a professional optics product supply chain based on a real case study. The supply chain sells a product via two sales agents with equal power. The manufacturer receives a single order from each agent at the beginning of the selling season. Stock is kept in the manufacturer’s central warehouse. Thus, the agents hold virtual inventory only. To obtain greater flexibility and earn more profit, the agents implement an inventory sharing policy between themselves, under which they can trade the excess product by negotiation. This study seeks to answer three questions regarding the implementation of inventory sharing: (1) Does inventory sharing always benefit all members of the supply chain? (2) Should the manufacturer charge agents service fees and if so, how much? (3) What is the mechanism for achieving an all-win situation? By formulating the problem as a mixed Stackelberg and Nash-bargaining game, this study observes that the current negotiation mechanism does not always benefit the supply chain and the manufacturer, because it gives too much flexibility to agents. An all-win leading inventory sharing mechanism is then proposed, and managerial insights are generated.
Keywords: Inventory sharing; Stackelberg game; Nash-bargaining game; Equilibrium; All-win situation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03177-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:291:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03177-3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03177-3
Access Statistics for this article
Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros
More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().