Impact of gray markets on strategic channel choice and social welfare

Abhishek Srivastava, Arqum Mateen, Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy, Suman Niranjan () and Ashutosh Sarkar
Additional contact information
Abhishek Srivastava: Kashipur, District- Udham Singh Nagar
Arqum Mateen: Quantitative Methods & Operations Management Area Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode IIMK Campus P.O.
Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy: Operations and Supply Chain Management University of Liverpool Management School Chatham Street
Suman Niranjan: University of North Texas
Ashutosh Sarkar: Quantitative Methods & Operations Management Area Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode IIMK Campus P.O.

Annals of Operations Research, 2024, vol. 340, issue 2, No 12, 1035-1062

Abstract: Abstract The diversion of manufacturers’ branded products outside the authorized channel leads to the emergence of gray markets (GMs), which is legal under the doctrine of first sale. Product diversion to GMs can negatively affect manufacturers’ brand reputation. In this study, we analyze a manufacturer’s strategic channel choice decision and its implications for social welfare in the presence of GMs and strategic consumers. We present scenarios in which the presence of GMs can either have a positive or negative impact on the manufacturer and the supply chain. Our findings indicate that the manufacturer and the supply chain become worse off due to product diversion to GMs under lower channel differentiation and high penalty cost for the loss of brand reputation due to product diversion. This effect is more severe for a decentralized supply chain, where product diversion does not directly affect the retailer’s profitability due to the erosion of brand reputation. In such scenarios, we suggest that manufacturers should follow a brand-protection strategy to curb product diversion to GMs. However, manufacturers selling product categories with low brand equity can follow a market-expansion strategy. In such cases, the presence of GMs provides an alternative channel to expand sales by capturing untapped consumer segments without incurring additional market search or advertising costs. This strategy also facilitates indirect price discrimination among consumers. We find that social welfare is higher when channel differentiation is low under a decentralized supply chain.

Keywords: Gray markets; Channel differentiation; Social welfare; Consumer surplus; Brand-protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-06094-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:340:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-024-06094-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-06094-2

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().