An integrated MCDM framework for evaluating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainable business performance

Kerui Yu (), Qun Wu (), Xiaoqing Chen (), Weizhong Wang () and Abbas Mardani ()
Additional contact information
Kerui Yu: Duke University
Qun Wu: Anhui University
Xiaoqing Chen: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Weizhong Wang: Anhui Normal University
Abbas Mardani: Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Annals of Operations Research, 2024, vol. 342, issue 1, No 29, 987-1018

Abstract: Abstract As a responsible business philosophy, sustainable management is becoming a widely accepted management mode among managers, practitioners, stakeholders, and customers. The sustainable development of business management calls for the practice of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principle. Companies that neglect ESG criteria in their business operations may face unexpected consequences. Therefore, the ESG sustainable performance of the company is becoming a benchmark to evaluate environmental and social responsibility of companies worldwide. This paper proposes an integrated MCDM framework combining the interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IT2FAHP) and the interval type-2 fuzzy combined compromise solution (IT2F-CoCoSo) method for evaluating the ESG sustainable performance of listed companies. In the integrated MCDM framework, the interval type-2 fuzzy sets serve as an effective tool to transform qualitative linguistic evaluation into quantitative expression, the criteria weights are obtained using the IT2FAHP, and the rankings of alternatives are determined by the IT2F-CoCoSo method. The proposed method is applied in a case study on the ESG sustainable performance evaluation of five medical listed companies, which are evaluated based on three aspects: E, S, and G and further divided into 14 criteria. Results reveal that the most important criterion in the E, S, and G aspects are pollution treatment, health and safety, and risk management. It suggests that the Pfizer biopharmaceutical company has the best ESG sustainable performance among the five alternative medical listed companies. We perform a sensitivity analysis with random criteria weights and different parameter values to show the stability of the proposed approach. A comparison is also performed between our approach and some existing methods for validating the proposed approach. This analysis shows that the proposed approach is efficient and well-consistent with the other methods.

Keywords: Sustainable business; ESG sustainable performance evaluation; Interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs); IT2FAHP; IT2F-CoCoSo method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05616-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05616-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05616-8

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().