Can government policies help to achieve the pollutant emissions information disclosure target in the Industry 4.0 era?

Tsan-Ming Choi () and Tana Siqin ()
Additional contact information
Tsan-Ming Choi: University of Liverpool Management School
Tana Siqin: Lingnan University

Annals of Operations Research, 2024, vol. 342, issue 2, No 4, 1129-1147

Abstract: Abstract In the Industry 4.0 era, manufacturers commonly adopt digital technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain technology to improve information disclosure. In this paper, we focus on how the government can properly set an extended producer responsibility (EPR) policy (penalty or subsidy) and impose it on the manufacturer to entice the manufacturer to set the optimal pollutant emissions information disclosure (PEID) level which maximizes the social welfare. In the basic model, we build a simple consumer utility based stylized analytical model. We first derive from the government perspective the social welfare function and obtain the closed-form expression of the optimal level of PEID. Then, we explore the manufacturer’s problem on PEID under the EPR policy. We show how the EPR policy can be set so that the government can entice the manufacturer to set the PEID level which maximizes the social welfare. We also uncover the factors governing the EPR policy, and show the situations under which the EPR policy is in fact a subsidy scheme (i.e., the government sponsors the manufacturer). To derive more insights and check for robustness, we extend the basic model in a number of ways, namely (i) the situation when the manufacturer is risk sensitive, (ii) the case with the extended consumer responsibility (ECR) policy, (iii) the scenario when there is a per unit PEID level dependent operating cost (i.e., a variable cost), and (iv) the case when the platform is not supported by blockchain. We find that the form of EPR policy and the qualitative insights remain valid for the cases when the manufacturer is risk sensitive and there is a PEID level dependent operating cost. Interestingly, we uncover that, unlike the EPR policy, the use of ECR policy fails to help.

Keywords: Digital technologies; Platform; Emissions; Extended producer responsibility; Extended consumer responsibility; Government; Blockchain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04712-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04712-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04712-5

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().