The analysis of the impact of the framing effect on the choice of financial products: an analytical hierarchical process approach

Viviana Ventre (), Roberta Martino (), Rosella Castellano () and Pasquale Sarnacchiaro ()
Additional contact information
Viviana Ventre: University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”
Roberta Martino: University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”
Rosella Castellano: University of Rome Unitelma Sapienza
Pasquale Sarnacchiaro: University of Naples Federico II

Annals of Operations Research, 2024, vol. 342, issue 3, No 10, 1563-1579

Abstract: Abstract Most economic and financial theories assume that market participants act rationally and use available information in their decision-making processes to maximize their expected utility. Recently, the scientific debate in behavioral economics and finance has highlighted that individuals can make choices other than those envisaged by standard economic theory. In fact, the choices can be conditioned by the way in which the alternatives are presented. In particular, the framing effect refers to the cognitive bias wherein an individual’s choice from a set of options is influenced more by how the information is worded than by the information itself. The purposes of this study are: testing if the framing effect affects investor's perception of risk and, consequently, decision making in choosing financial products; investigating if the effect is different in relation to certain social, cultural and demographic characteristics of the investor. By considering Italian people aged between 20 and 64 years as target population, a questionnaire was administered to 1130 individuals to understand how two of the main common types of presentation of non-equity financial products (i.e.: “What-If” and “probabilistic scenarios”) can influence the decision-making process. The data analysis was carried out by using the analytical hierarchical process approach that is a multi-criteria support technique that allows to compare qualitative and quantitative criteria that would otherwise be difficult to compare. In the present paper, the use of analytical hierarchical process allowed the decomposition of each decision maker's decision-making process into personal characteristics.

Keywords: Risk perception; AHP; What-if; Probabilistic scenarios; Strategic customization; Framing effect; Risk perception; Investment funds; Behavioral finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-05142-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:342:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05142-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-05142-z

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().