EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Data analytics for quality management in Industry 4.0 from a MSME perspective

Gorkem Sariyer (), Sachin Kumar Mangla (), Yigit Kazancoglu (), Ceren Ocal Tasar () and Sunil Luthra ()
Additional contact information
Gorkem Sariyer: Yasar University
Sachin Kumar Mangla: O P Jindal Global University
Yigit Kazancoglu: Yasar University
Ceren Ocal Tasar: Independent Researcher
Sunil Luthra: Ch. Ranbir Singh State Institute of Engineering & Technology

Annals of Operations Research, 2025, vol. 350, issue 2, No 2, 365-393

Abstract: Abstract Advances in smart technologies (Industry 4.0) assist managers of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) to control quality in manufacturing using sophisticated data-driven techniques. This study presents a 3-stage model that classifies products depending on defects (defects or non-defects) and defect type according to their levels. This article seeks to detect potential errors to ensure superior quality through machine learning and data mining. The proposed model is tested in a medium enterprise—a kitchenware company in Turkey. Using the main features of data set, product, customer, country, production line, production volume, sample quantity and defect code, a Multilayer Perceptron algorithm for product quality level classification was developed with 96% accuracy. Once a defect is detected, an estimation is made of how many re-works are required. Thus, considering the attributes of product, production line, production volume, sample quantity and product quality level, a Multilayer Perceptron algorithm for re-work quantity prediction model was developed with 98% performance. From the findings, re-work quantity has the highest relation with product quality level where re-work quantities were higher for major defects compared to minor/moderate defects. Finally, this work explores the root causes of defects considering production line and product quality level through association rule mining. The top mined rule achieves a confidence level of 80% where assembly and material were identified as main root causes.

Keywords: MSME; Machine learning; Quality control; Industry 4.0; Data analytics; Manufacturing; Association rule mining; Re-work and root causes of defect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04215-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:350:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04215-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04215-9

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-19
Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:350:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04215-9