DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation
Annals of Operations Research, 1997, vol. 73, issue 0, 277-298
In this paper, we introduce the notion of "best practice" or "minimal extrapolation" regulation, and we show that cost reimbursement based on best practice norms may be (second best) optimal when the regulated firms have superior technological information and make non-verifiable cost reductions. In particular, we investigate the use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in regulatory environments with considerable technological uncertainty. A series of DEA models, including the crs, drs, vrs, fdh and frh models, are considered, and it is shown that schemes which reimburse actual costs plus a fraction of DEA estimated cost reductions will (1) induce the firms to minimize costs and (2) minimize the informational rents of the firms. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997
Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); incentives; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (42) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:73:y:1997:i:0:p:277-298:10.1023/a:1018985313272
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros
More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().