Objectivity and subjectivity in thedecision making process

John T. Buchanan, Erez J. Henig and Mordecai I. Henig

Annals of Operations Research, 1998, vol. 80, issue 0, 333-345

Abstract: Classical Operations Research assumed objectivity. Operations researchers hardly botheredto ask the decision maker about his or her preferences, assuming that a well-defined singleobjective function was an adequate representation of the decision problem. Many multi-criteriadecision methods began in response to this failure of Operations Research. Othermethods took a totally different and more subjective point of view. In this paper, we discussobjective and subjective descriptions, their interpretation and use in decision making. In thecenter of the ability to distinguish between these objective and subjective components standscientific methods and scientists. We argue that it is possible and necessary to understandwhere and how objective measures should be replaced by subjective measures and judgementin the decision making process. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018980318183 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:80:y:1998:i:0:p:333-345:10.1023/a:1018980318183

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1023/A:1018980318183

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().