Uncertainty in energy-economic modelling of the electrical power sector

Hans Ravn and Klaus Skytte

Annals of Operations Research, 2000, vol. 97, issue 1, 213-229

Abstract: The purpose of the present paper is to investigate what significance, if any, inclusion of uncertainties has for the conclusions of the modelling and analysis, i.e., whether the policy recommendations implicit in the results of the analysis depend on the inclusion or not of uncertainties. We do this within the context of a model of the Northern European electricity sector. The paper considers uncertainties about future states of nature. More specifically, we consider the inflow of water into a hydropower production system, where the states of nature are represented by a “dry”, a “normal” and a “wet” year. The problems may be formulated as non-linear optimisation models where the objective function basically consists of the expected value of the sum of consumers', producers', and authorities' surplus. The models take into account that there are losses in the transmission and distribution of electricity, and that the consumers pay an energy tax on their use of electricity. The consumers are divided into two groups, households and industry. Also, complementarity formulations are used, as these are shown to be more adequate for certain aspects, in particular where risk aversion within a liberalised market context is modelled. For each of eight Northern European countries, the basic results of the models are the installation of new production capacities, the production on old and new production capacities, the electricity prices, and the interchange between the countries. The investment in new production capacity is represented by a single value for each country, while the productions differ in that they depend on natural phenomena, which we refer to as the state of nature and represent by stochastic variables. It was found that in this context it was relatively easy to include stochastic elements in the model. Second, complementarity formulations are preferable to optimisation based modelling for some problem types. Third, results of the stochastic model have natural interpretations, also compared to one or several versions of a deterministic model. And fourth, we have seen that the quantitative results, and hence the implied policy recommendations, may differ significantly from those of deterministic models. We therefore conclude that increased attention should be given to the inclusion of stochastic elements into the modelling of energy systems. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018988510624 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:annopr:v:97:y:2000:i:1:p:213-229:10.1023/a:1018988510624

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10479

DOI: 10.1023/A:1018988510624

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Operations Research is currently edited by Endre Boros

More articles in Annals of Operations Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().