On the relationship between travel time and travel distance of commuters Reported versus network travel data in the Netherlands

Bert Zwart, Piet Rietveld, Toon van den Hoorn and Bert van Wee
Additional contact information
Bert Zwart: Faculty of Economics, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Toon van den Hoorn: Ministry of Transport, P.O. Box 1031, 3000BA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Bert van Wee: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands

The Annals of Regional Science, 1999, vol. 33, issue 3, 269-287

Abstract: This paper gives a detailed empirical analysis of the relationships between different indicators of costs of commuting trips by car: difference as the crow flies, shortest travel time according to route planner, corresponding travel distance, and reported travel time. Reported travel times are usually rounded in multiples of five minutes. This calls for special statistical techniques. Ignoring the phenomenon of rounding leads to biased estimation results for shorter distances. Rather surprisingly, the distance as the crow flies and the network distance appear to be slightly better proxies of the reported travel time compared with the shortest network travel time as indicated by the route planner. We conclude that where actual driving times are missing in commuting research the other three indicators mentioned may be used as proxies, but that the following problems may emerge: actual travel times may be considerably higher than network times generated by route planners, and the average speed of trips increases considerably with distance, implying an overestimate of travel time for long distance commuters. The only personal feature that contributes significantly to variations in reported travel times is gender: women appear to drive at lower average speeds according to our data. As indicated in the paper this may be explained by the differences in the car types of male and female drivers (females drive older and smaller cars) as well as higher numbers of stops/trip chaining among women. A concise analysis is carried out for carpoolers. Car-pooling leads to an increase in travel time of some 17% compared with solo drivers covering the same distance. In the case of car poolers, the above mentioned measures appear to be very poor proxies for the actual commuting times.

Date: 1999-08-23
Note: Received: November 1996/Accepted: January 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00168/papers/9033003/90330269.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:anresc:v:33:y:1999:i:3:p:269-287

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.com/journal/168

Access Statistics for this article

The Annals of Regional Science is currently edited by Martin Andersson, E. Kim and Janet E. Kohlhase

More articles in The Annals of Regional Science from Springer, Western Regional Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().