One size does not fit all: evaluating the impact of microenterprise measurement on policy evaluation

Sergio A. Contreras ()
Additional contact information
Sergio A. Contreras: Universidad Catolica del Norte Sede Coquimbo

The Annals of Regional Science, 2022, vol. 68, issue 3, No 3, 587-613

Abstract: Abstract Researchers and economic development practitioners regard microenterprises (MEs) as pivotal actors for economic development, poverty alleviation, and job creation. Notwithstanding the importance of MEs in the economy, there is no consistent definition of MEs, and thus, there is no consensus on the appropriate measurement and criteria that should be used to evaluate MEs formation. Two of the most commonly accepted standards criteria to determine MEs are the number of employees and total annual revenues. Although there is a growing body of research conducted on ME formation using the employment criteria to determine the firm size, fewer studies have used the revenue criteria. These criteria will be compared in a regional activity model at different units of geographic scale (state, county, and census tract level) using data from US businesses. Results suggest that there are no statistically significant changes in the estimated model when the criteria are changed for the same geographic unit of scale. However, for the same criteria (employment-based or revenue-based), a change in the unit of geographic aggregation produces different and sometimes contradictory results. These results imply that evaluations of MEs and their factors are more sensitive to scale than to criteria, raising awareness that for proper program evaluation, the unit of data aggregation matters.

JEL-codes: H32 J48 L25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00168-021-01094-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:anresc:v:68:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s00168-021-01094-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://link.springer.com/journal/168

DOI: 10.1007/s00168-021-01094-7

Access Statistics for this article

The Annals of Regional Science is currently edited by Martin Andersson, E. Kim and Janet E. Kohlhase

More articles in The Annals of Regional Science from Springer, Western Regional Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().