EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Quality of Life Perception Gap in Prison Health Care Settings: Rater Disparities among Incarcerated Patients and Peer Caregivers

Stephanie Grace Prost (), Stephen J. Tripodi and Jeffrey R. Lacasse
Additional contact information
Stephanie Grace Prost: University of Louisville
Stephen J. Tripodi: Florida State University
Jeffrey R. Lacasse: Florida State University

Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2020, vol. 15, issue 4, No 15, 1223-1240

Abstract: Abstract Peer caregivers are specially-trained incarcerated persons who support the needs of patients in correctional health care settings. Their role is of particular importance in light of the growing population of older adult prisoners with complex health problems in U.S. prisons. The purpose of the current study was to examine the disparity between patient and peer caregiver ratings of patient quality of life (QoL) in a sample of correctional health dyads (n = 52) in a state prison system. The current study also aimed to identify which patient and caregiver characteristics were most closely associated with emerging disparities. The sample and measures were described using frequencies and descriptive statistics. Patient QoL was measured using the McGill Quality of Life Scale-Cardiff Short Form and rater disparity was calculated at the individual- and group-level. Potential correlates were identified using bivariate statistics. Main results indicate group-level disparities were smallest among psychological and physical QoL (d = .06), and largest regarding existential QoL (d = .22). Few bivariate relationships were meaningful in effect, though patient characteristics accounted for 79% of emerging associations (viz. primary diagnosis). Though disparities emerged, peer caregivers in correctional health settings have unique strengths regarding assessment of patient QoL. Implications related to reducing dyadic disparities and targeting caregiver training regarding the importance of patient existential QoL are discussed.

Keywords: Quality of life; Rater disparity; Correctional health; Incarcerated persons; Prison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-019-09732-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:15:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11482-019-09732-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11482

DOI: 10.1007/s11482-019-09732-1

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Research in Quality of Life is currently edited by Daniel Shek

More articles in Applied Research in Quality of Life from Springer, International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:15:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11482-019-09732-1