Income Inequality in the Great Recession did not Harm Subjective Health in Europe, 2003–2012

M. D. R. Evans (), Jonathan Kelley (), C. G. E. Kelley () and S. M. C. Kelley ()
Additional contact information
M. D. R. Evans: University of Nevada; and Department of Survey Design and analytics, International Survey Center
Jonathan Kelley: University of Nevada; and Department of Survey Design and analytics, International Survey Center
C. G. E. Kelley: Child Trends
S. M. C. Kelley: Child Trends

Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2020, vol. 15, issue 5, No 10, 1473 pages

Abstract: Abstract A rich tradition of research has addressed income inequality and health, but the issue has achieved a fresh currency with the reversals of economic fortunes wrought by the Great Recession. This paper analyses the degree to which changing inequality induced by the Great Recession impacted Europeans’ subjective health (self-rated health and satisfaction with health). To address this question, we analyse the multilevel European Quality of Life Survey conducted mainly in 2003, 2008, and 2012 which provides representative samples from 24 European countries at all three time points, as well as national-level data on inequality (Gini coefficient) and appropriate national-level and individual-level controls. We find that, net of GDP, inequality has no statistically significant impact before, during or after the Great Recession. Turning to determinants, our variance-components multi-level models controlling for known individual-level predictors show that inequality remains insignificant at all time points, while individual family income is strongly related to subjective health GDP per capita has little effect except indirectly through income. We also assessed impacts specifically for vulnerable, at-risk groups. Including GDP per capita, Gini coefficient, and individual level controls, our model explains about one quarter of the variance in health status (R-squared >.23). All in all, our results support a rational choice, materialist hypothesis: that absolute prosperity of the individual matters to subjective health, but income inequality does not, in Europe in this period. This supports a policy emphasis on increasing levels of pay, and on poverty relief, rather than on reducing inequality.

Keywords: Health; Subjective health; Wellbeing; Great Recession; Inequality; Europe; Income; GDP; Quality of life; Recession (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-019-09741-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:15:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s11482-019-09741-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11482

DOI: 10.1007/s11482-019-09741-0

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Research in Quality of Life is currently edited by Daniel Shek

More articles in Applied Research in Quality of Life from Springer, International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().