Testing The Benefits Theory of Leisure Wellbeing

Dong-Jin Lee (), Grace B. Yu () and M. Joseph Sirgy
Additional contact information
Dong-Jin Lee: Yonsei University
Grace B. Yu: Duksung Women’s University
M. Joseph Sirgy: Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2023, vol. 18, issue 5, No 23, 2705-2748

Abstract: Abstract The purpose of this study is to empirically test Sirgy, Uysal, & Kruger’s (2017) benefits theory of leisure wellbeing in the March 2017 issue of the Applied Research in Quality of Life. The theoretical model posits that leisure activities contribute to leisure wellbeing by satisfying a set of basic needs (benefits related to safety, health, economic, sensory, escape, and sensation) and growth needs (symbolic, aesthetic, moral, mastery, relatedness, and distinctiveness), moderated by corresponding personality variables (safety consciousness, health conscious, price sensitivity, hedonism, escapism, sensation seeking, status consciousness, aestheticism, moral sensitivity, mastery seeking, extroversion, and need for distinction, respectively). The model was tested using data collected in South Korea using a sample of 502 adult leisure activity participants. The study results supported the theoretical notion that leisure activities contribute to leisure wellbeing through perceived benefits pertaining to safety, health, economic, sensory, escape, and sensation (benefits related to basic needs) as well as perceived benefits pertaining to symbolic, aesthetic, moral, mastery, relatedness, and distinctiveness (benefits related to growth needs). The results also indicate that personality variables influence the perception of leisure benefits, which in turn has a direct effect on leisure wellbeing. In other words, the results largely support the mediation, not moderation, effects of personality variables on leisure wellbeing. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

Keywords: Leisure benefit theory; Basic needs benefits; Growth needs benefits; Personality; Leisure wellbeing; Subjective wellbeing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11482-023-10204-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:18:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s11482-023-10204-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11482

DOI: 10.1007/s11482-023-10204-w

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Research in Quality of Life is currently edited by Daniel Shek

More articles in Applied Research in Quality of Life from Springer, International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().