What Matters in for the Subjective Well-Being of Children in Care?

Joan Llosada-Gistau (), Ferran Casas and Carme Montserrat
Additional contact information
Joan Llosada-Gistau: Universitat de Girona
Ferran Casas: Universitat de Girona
Carme Montserrat: Universitat de Girona

Child Indicators Research, 2017, vol. 10, issue 3, No 8, 735-760

Abstract: Abstract Children’s subjective well-being (SWB) constitutes an important component in understanding their quality of life. However, little is known about children in public care regarding their perceptions and satisfaction with life. The purpose of this study is to explore differences in SWB between adolescents in residential care, kinship care and family foster care with no relatives. The study used data from care population in Catalonia (Spain) aged 12–14 years (N = 669): 397 adolescents in residential care, 251 adolescents in kinship care and 41 adolescents in non-kinship foster care. The questionnaire of the International Survey of Children’s Well-Being (ISCWeB) was adapted for children in care. It includes a psychometric scale on SWB, the Personal Well-Being Index-School Children (PWI-SC6). Multiple regressions have been used to explore which factors are related to children’s subjective well-being according to type of placement. Findings showed that adolescents living in kinship and non-kinship foster care reported better SWB in all life domains than those in residential care. On one hand, variables as gender and age and on the other hand, the agreement with their placement, satisfaction with the school, with their relationships with friends, and with their use of time and computer, may have an influence on their SWB. These findings highlight the need to address the participation of children any decision that affects their lives, the importance of supporting the education of children in care, and the importance of having friends and of their leisure time. Results are discussed in view of the value of practice and political implications.

Keywords: Children; Subjective well-being; Residential care; Kinship care; Non-kinship foster care (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-016-9405-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:chinre:v:10:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s12187-016-9405-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... f-life/journal/12187

DOI: 10.1007/s12187-016-9405-z

Access Statistics for this article

Child Indicators Research is currently edited by Asher Ben-Arieh

More articles in Child Indicators Research from Springer, The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().