Dominant Research on Child Neglect and Dialogic Practices: when the Voice of Families is Translated or Ignored

Vicky Lafantaisie (), Jean-Charles St-Louis, Annie Bérubé, Tristan Milot and Carl Lacharité
Additional contact information
Vicky Lafantaisie: Université du Québec en Outaouais
Jean-Charles St-Louis: Université de Montréal
Annie Bérubé: Université du Québec en Outaouais
Tristan Milot: Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Carl Lacharité: Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Child Indicators Research, 2020, vol. 13, issue 2, No 4, 431 pages

Abstract: Abstract Reflecting upon research on child neglect, this article focuses on the importance (or lack thereof) given to the views of families in neglect situation within this field. Based on an analysis of recent studies in the field of neglect, it aims to document how mainstream research excludes the experiences and points of view of parents and children. We pursue two objectives: 1) to describe mainstream research practices by identifying the theoretical and methodological traits that underlie the production of knowledge; 2) to explore the gap between the knowledge produced by traditional research and the experience of parents. To meet these goals, we used an approach inspired by institutional ethnography (Smith 2005) to analyze how neglect is treated in scientific discourse. The article thus highlights different characteristics of this discourse, which can be seen as an “individualizing” reading of the problem. The dominant framework leads to a normalizing\standardizing approach based on the evaluation and correction of behaviors deemed “inappropriate”. We then contrasts the attributes of mainstream research with the speeches of parents who have participated in a neglect intervention program. By showing some blind spots of mainstream research practices, our analysis wish to carry further the reflection on the ways knowledge production may better reflect the perspectives of marginalized people.

Keywords: Child neglect; Mainstream research; Qualitative analysis; Institutional ethnography (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-019-09679-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:chinre:v:13:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s12187-019-09679-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... f-life/journal/12187

DOI: 10.1007/s12187-019-09679-7

Access Statistics for this article

Child Indicators Research is currently edited by Asher Ben-Arieh

More articles in Child Indicators Research from Springer, The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().