The Child and Adolescent Thriving Index 1.0: Developing a Measure of the Outcome Indicators of Well-Being for Population Health Assessment

Nathaniel W. Anderson (), Anna J. Markowitz, Daniel Eisenberg, Neal Halfon, Kristin Anderson Moore and Frederick J. Zimmerman
Additional contact information
Nathaniel W. Anderson: UCLA
Anna J. Markowitz: UCLA
Daniel Eisenberg: UCLA
Neal Halfon: UCLA
Kristin Anderson Moore: Child Trends
Frederick J. Zimmerman: UCLA

Child Indicators Research, 2022, vol. 15, issue 6, No 4, 2015-2042

Abstract: Abstract The well-being of children and adolescents is emerging as an area of interest for population health measurement. Previous approaches assessing national and state trends in well-being have relied on composite indices. However, these methodologies suffer from several weaknesses. This paper develops an improved index for the United States that is measurable with existing population-data resources. It derives the appropriate weights for items in this index using a longitudinal panel of 2,942 children in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Candidate component measures are selected for the index based on their demonstrated association with several subjective scales assessed during young adulthood. The final index demonstrates that a broad range of measures indicate higher levels of population-level well-being. The predictive validity of the index for outcomes during young adulthood is also assessed: a one-standard-deviation increase in the index score is associated with a 7.9-percentage-point decrease [95% CI: 5.9 – 9.8] in ever reporting fair or poor health, a 6.3-percentage-point decrease [95% CI: 4.6 – 8.0] in ever reporting depression, and a 17.2% [95% CI: 13.7% – 20.5%] increase in peak earnings. These values for predictive validity are slightly higher than those of existing methodologies. We also find that incorporating contextual indicators from childhood and adolescence does not substantively improve predictive validity. Policy-makers and government agencies interested in population-level well-being of children and adolescents can continue to use existing indices as reasonable proxies, but should also commit to upgrading data systems to make them more child-centric in the future.

Keywords: Child Well-Being; Adolescent Well-Being; Measurement; Composite Indices; Population Health; Predictive Validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-022-09962-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:chinre:v:15:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s12187-022-09962-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... f-life/journal/12187

DOI: 10.1007/s12187-022-09962-0

Access Statistics for this article

Child Indicators Research is currently edited by Asher Ben-Arieh

More articles in Child Indicators Research from Springer, The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().