Benefit-of-the-Doubt in the Spatial Analysis of Child Well-Being in European Countries

Matheus Pereira Libório (), Alexandre Magno Alvez Diniz (), Angélica Cidália Gouveia Santos (), Cristiane Neri Nobre (), Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira (), Hasheem Mannan (), Marcos Flávio Silveira Vasconcelos Dangelo (), Patrícia Bernardes () and Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel ()
Additional contact information
Matheus Pereira Libório: Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais
Alexandre Magno Alvez Diniz: Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais
Angélica Cidália Gouveia Santos: Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais
Cristiane Neri Nobre: Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais
Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira: Enacom Handcrafted Technologies
Hasheem Mannan: University College Dublin
Marcos Flávio Silveira Vasconcelos Dangelo: State University of Montes Claros
Patrícia Bernardes: Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais
Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel: Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais

Child Indicators Research, 2024, vol. 17, issue 4, No 17, 1870 pages

Abstract: Abstract The Benefit-of-the-Doubt is one of the most popular methods for constructing composite indicators, with the main characteristic being the endogenous and individualized weighting of sub-indicators, which minimizes conflicts related to this definition. Greater weights are assigned to sub-indicators with the highest value, and smaller weights are assigned to sub-indicators with the lowest value. On the one hand, this unique mathematical property is very appropriate for studies with a geographical perspective as it operationalizes the spatial heterogeneity concept, in which the influence of the sub-indicator on the composite indicator varies from one geographic area to another. On the other hand, the weighting of sub-indicators is aimed at maximizing the scores of the composite indicator, reducing the explanatory and discriminative power of the composite indicator. This research introduces a framework that minimizes the problem of low discriminative and explanatory power of composite indicators constructed by the Benefit-of-the-Doubt. Another novelty of the research is the possibility of considering sub-indicators with greater conceptual importance, balancing the influence of dimensions on the composite indicator, and an approach to measuring the composite indicator’s spatial heterogeneity degree. These innovations present high levels of originality and applicability, contributing to the dissemination of the Benefit-of-the-Doubt in constructing composite indicators and developing public policies based on geographical representations with adequate explanatory and discriminatory power.

Keywords: Composite indicators; Multidimensional phenomena; Child well-being; Spatial heterogeneity; Explanatory and discriminating power (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-024-10145-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:chinre:v:17:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s12187-024-10145-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... f-life/journal/12187

DOI: 10.1007/s12187-024-10145-2

Access Statistics for this article

Child Indicators Research is currently edited by Asher Ben-Arieh

More articles in Child Indicators Research from Springer, The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().