EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Towards the Development of Sustainable Ground Improvement Techniques—Biocementation Study of an Organic Soil

M. U. Safdar, M. Mavroulidou (), M. J. Gunn, D. Purchase, C. Gray, I. Payne and J. Garelick
Additional contact information
M. U. Safdar: London South Bank University
M. Mavroulidou: London South Bank University
M. J. Gunn: London South Bank University
D. Purchase: Middlesex University
C. Gray: London South Bank University
I. Payne: Network Rail
J. Garelick: Network Rail

Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2022, vol. 2, issue 4, 1589-1614

Abstract: Abstract Ongoing research effort is dedicated to the development of innovative, superior and cost-effective ground improvement techniques to mitigate natural and man-made hazards while minimising waste and other environmental impacts. In this context, the nature-based process of biocementation of soils has been proposed as a potentially more sustainable technique than conventional chemical ground improvement practices. This paper focuses on the biocementation of an organic soil of the UK railway network. Having recently proven the feasibility of biocementing this soil using indigenous ureolytic bacteria, in this paper, the authors perform a parametric study to identify treatments successful in increasing the strength of the soil. Selected treatments are then applied to the soil to assess its volume change during consolidation, secondary compression and shrinkage upon drying. The results show that, depending on the treatments used, biocementation has increased the unconfined compressive strength by up to 81% compared to that of the control samples. For selected treatments and the range of water contents tested (55–33%), shrinkage upon drying reduced by 16%, while the volumetric strains of the soil upon 1-D compression reduced by 32–47%. This was reflected in the values of the coefficient of volume compressibility and the coefficient of secondary compression (the latter either reduced by up to an order of magnitude or secondary compression was not observed altogether in the testing period). Overall, the results proved that biocementation improved considerably the mechanical properties of the organic soil, which gives promise for addressing the settlement problems of this soil.

Keywords: Biocementation; Organic soil; Urea hydrolysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-021-00071-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00071-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/43615

DOI: 10.1007/s43615-021-00071-8

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Circular Economy and Sustainability from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00071-8