Stakeholder Pressure, Circular Economy Practices, and Sustainability Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ecological Innovation Capabilities

Vivian Osei (), Disraeli Asante-Darko () and Matthew Quayson ()
Additional contact information
Vivian Osei: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Disraeli Asante-Darko: GIMPA Business School
Matthew Quayson: Ho Technical University

Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2024, vol. 4, issue 4, 3139-3170

Abstract: Abstract The literature linking circular economy (CE) and the triple bottom line (TBL) approach to sustainable development presents contradictory findings and lacks empirical support, other than implicit claims alluded to in current anecdotes, unsubstantiated with adequate scientific theories. Besides, whether adopting CE practices at the micro-level can support corporate sustainability remains unclear, owing to limitations in ecological innovation capabilities to support CE. Drawing on stakeholder theory and ecological modernization theory (EMT), we construct a theoretical framework that investigates whether stakeholder pressures for implementing CE practices can augment the TBL values of sustainability performance, moderated by firms’ ecological innovation capabilities for the CE paradigm. Using data from firms operating in Ghana’s mining industry, the conceptual model was evaluated using partial least square structural equation modeling. The results confirm the relevance of the pressures originating from organizational, market, and regulatory stakeholders to implement CE practices as a strong sustainability paradigm for enhancing the TBL dimensions. Also, companies that yield to stakeholder pressures to build innovative capabilities can effectively implement CE practices and improve their sustainability performance. Notably, high levels of ecological innovation capabilities complement CE practices to strengthen economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Subsequently, we supplement the growing theoretical discourse on CE’s contribution to sustainability with empirical information from the mining industry within an emerging country via the EMT and stakeholder theory to support CE advancement within firms’ operations and the broader sustainable development framework. Also, the critical implications for practice and policy are suggested.

Keywords: Circular economy; Sustainability performance; Stakeholder pressure; Ecological innovation capabilities; Ecological modernization theory (EMT); Mining (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-024-00373-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:circec:v:4:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00373-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/journal/43615

DOI: 10.1007/s43615-024-00373-7

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Circular Economy and Sustainability from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().