Reinventing perished “Belgium of the East”: new estimates of GDP for inter-war Latvia (1920–1939)

Adomas Klimantas (), Zenonas Norkus (), Jurgita Markevičiūtė (), Ola Honningdal Grytten () and Jānis Šiliņš ()
Additional contact information
Adomas Klimantas: Vilnius University
Zenonas Norkus: Vilnius University
Jurgita Markevičiūtė: Vilnius University
Ola Honningdal Grytten: Norwegian School of Economics NHH
Jānis Šiliņš: Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences

Cliometrica, 2024, vol. 18, issue 3, No 4, 765-835

Abstract: Abstract The British Historian John Hiden once called pre-WWI Latvia “the Belgium of the East” due to its highly advanced manufacturing, serving the Russian market. The independent Latvian nation-state (1918–1940) lost this status together with the industrial equipment, evacuated in 1915–1916 to mainland Russia and never returned. Inter-war Latvia did attempt to “Denmarkize”, i.e., to become an internationally important exporter of food and to re-industrialize. Both its economic success and growth performance are severely contested. According to Roses and Wolf (in: Broadberry S, O’Rourke KH (eds) The Cambridge economic history of modern Europe, vol 2. 1870 to the present. Cambridge UP, Cambridge, pp 183–207, 2010), Latvia’s GDP per capita growth rate was the highest among the European countries in 1929–1938. According to the most authoritative expatriate Latvian account by Aizsilnieks (Latvijas saimniecības vēsture, 1914–1945. Daugava, Stockholm, 1968), the growth stagnated in the years of the authoritarian Karlis Ulmanis regime (1934–1940). Roses and Wolf estimates are indirect. Aizsilnieks grounds his conclusions in the methodologically outdated national income estimates from inter-war times. This paper resolves the controversy by providing direct supply-side time series of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 1920–1939, based on a benchmark estimate of Latvia’s GDP in 1935 by Norkus et al. (Cliometrica, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-022-00260-x , 2022). Main findings: The economic growth continued after 1934, but it was not Europe´s top growth performer in 1929–1938. However, in 1922–1938, its growth performance was the best, also due to a very low baseline after the extreme war-related economic destruction. The “Denmarkization” process was only partially successful because agricultural productivity remained low, and the re-industrialization was mainly import-substitution. We also did find that since 1936, Latvia’s GDP per capita grew with substantial stagnation of the sectoral share of agriculture and a re-shift from services to manufacturing.

Keywords: Gross domestic product (GDP); Economic growth; Deindustrialization; Re-industrialization; Latvia; Inter-war Europe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E01 N14 O14 O47 O52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11698-023-00275-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:cliomt:v:18:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11698-023-00275-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11698

DOI: 10.1007/s11698-023-00275-y

Access Statistics for this article

Cliometrica is currently edited by Claude Diebolt

More articles in Cliometrica from Springer, Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().