Research Note “Replicating Published Literature Review using ChatGPT-Plus: Observations”

Anindita Chakravarty ()
Additional contact information
Anindita Chakravarty: Terry College of Business, University of Georgia

Customer Needs and Solutions, 2024, vol. 11, issue 1, No 1, 6 pages

Abstract: Abstract Generative Artificial tools are prolific though their utility for academic writing or creating journal ready manuscripts is unclear. With the general goal of understanding how these AI tools such as ChatGPT might be used for academic writing in Marketing, I try to replicate a published review article using ChatGPT version Plus prompts. Using my observations of the tool's responses to my prompts, I provide strengths and weaknesses and implications for usage of Generative AI tools for academic writing in Marketing.

Keywords: AI replication; Literature review; Marketing myopia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40547-024-00144-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:custns:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40547-024-00144-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40547

DOI: 10.1007/s40547-024-00144-3

Access Statistics for this article

Customer Needs and Solutions is currently edited by Min Ding

More articles in Customer Needs and Solutions from Springer, Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().