Measuring and adjusting for overconfidence

P. Schanbacher ()

Decisions in Economics and Finance, 2014, vol. 37, issue 2, 423-452

Abstract: To evaluate density forecasts, the applied scoring rule is often arbitrarily chosen. The selection of the scoring rule strongly influences the ranking of forecasts. This paper identifies overconfidence as the main driver for scoring differences. A novel approach to measure overconfidence is proposed. Based on a non-proper scoring rule, the forecasts can be individually adjusted toward a calibrated forecast. Applying the adjustment procedure to the survey of professional forecasters, it can be shown that out-of-sample forecasts can be significantly improved. Also the ranking of the adjusted forecasts becomes less sensitive to the selection of scoring rules. Copyright Springer-Verlag Italia 2014

Keywords: Belief measurement; Proper scoring rules; Overconfidence; Probability adjustment; C53; E37; D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10203-013-0153-y (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:decfin:v:37:y:2014:i:2:p:423-452

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/10203/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10203-013-0153-y

Access Statistics for this article

Decisions in Economics and Finance is currently edited by Paolo Ghirardato

More articles in Decisions in Economics and Finance from Springer, Associazione per la Matematica
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().